Gabion: Retained Writing on Architecture
Normal Font Size | Increase Font Size
  About GabionArticlesBooksVaultsContactEmail AlertsSearchStoreHome
 


Nick Grimshaw's National Space Centre in Leicester

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3

If last year was the year of art and architecture in Britain, this year it is science's turn. Sated by gallery after new and revamped gallery in 2000, in 2001 we are faced with a wave of science centres, in Glasgow, in Rotherham, and now in Leicester, where Nicholas Grimshaw's £52m National Space Centre opens at the end of the month. We know that the art galleries are a huge hit with the public, but it is still too early to tell if their scientific rivals will enjoy the same pulling power. Not that it's for want of trying: there is a powerful symbiosis between the architectural and scientific disciplines.

We conventionally regard architecture as an art - even the Mother of the Arts - and most ambitious architects accordingly like to think of themselves as artists. This is why their dream commission - the one most likely to get them onto the fast-track to fame and fortune - is what in America (and increasingly elsewhere) is called an art museum. A Tate, a Guggenheim, even a Walsall. The reflected glory is intense. You get a hit out of designing for art, you have lunches with agreeable and clever people, you know that everyone will write about you and film you. It's just not the same designing an edge-of-town supermarket. Science buildings, though - hmmm. Not in the same league as art buildings, fame-wise. But they have their moments.

There is a whole generation of architects which has aligned itself with science and industry. Nothing new there - Professor Lisa Jardine, for instance, in fascinating research undertaken for the Royal Society, has established just how much the architecture of Christopher Wren (a mathematician, astronomer and Royal Society member) drew on the expertise of other scientists of his time. Most notably, his friend and colleague Robert Hooke. Wren's buildings, she convincingly suggests, are conceived as vessels for experimentation and observation, yea, even St. Paul's Cathedral.

You know today's inheritors of this tradition. They are the glass-and-steel brigade, brought up on Meccano rather than Lego. These architects are the ones routinely described as "high-tech". They differ from each other in every respect except one: they do not like to be described as "high-tech". Still, nobody has yet thought of a better term. Nicholas Grimshaw likes it least - he regards it as a degraded description, too often applied to mere industrial chic - yet he perhaps deserves it most. As we see from his almost too successful Eden Project in Cornwall (most days there are traffic jams of people desperate to get in) Grimshaw and his colleagues are still hard at it, inventing and refining things, playing with their bolt-together kits. And at Leicester they have invented a new kind of building. It's one of those places people instinctively invent nicknames for. My editors, for instance, call it "the maggot".

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3

Email this page to a friend